<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FinanceRegs.com &#187; Latest news &amp; views</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.financeregs.com/category/latest-news-views/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.financeregs.com</link>
	<description>Breaking news &#38; updates for Finance and Accounting pros</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:11:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>More worried people = more interruptions for you</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/more-worried-people-more-interruptions-for-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/more-worried-people-more-interruptions-for-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fringe benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring & training staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A/P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reimbursements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nervous vendors eager for payment. Cash-strapped employees who need their checks yesterday in order to pay their bills. When people have shaky finances, it means more phone calls and questions for Accounting pros. As tempting as it can be some days, turning off the phone and hiding under your desk isn&#8217;t an option. But there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nervous vendors eager for payment. Cash-strapped employees who need their checks yesterday in order to pay their bills. When people have shaky finances, it means more phone calls and questions for Accounting pros. <span id="more-801"></span>As tempting as it can be some days, turning off the phone and hiding under your desk isn&#8217;t an option. But there are some steps you can take to minimize the interruptions so you can get your work done &#8212; and still offer the assistance that everyone else is looking for. Here are some ideas:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Use voicemail creatively.</strong> Voicemail isn&#8217;t just for taking messages, it can send them too. Changing your outgoing message to include the most frequently asked-for info (what days checks are mailed, deadlines for common forms, etc.) can head off an amazing amount of questions.</li>
<li><strong>Dedicate different lines for different tasks.</strong> If your phone system allows it, set up separate phone lines/voicemail boxes for your different internal and external &#8220;customers.&#8221; For example, you could direct callers with questions about vendor payments to one line, those looking for T&amp;E reimbursements to another, and employees with questions about payroll or benefits to a third. That way, you can take care of related questions in one swoop, which should save time and mental energy.</li>
<li><strong>Create a FAQ page for Accounting</strong>. If, like most Accounting pros, you get the same few questions over and over, it&#8217;s time to create a set list of answers. Posted on the intranet, or even sent as a quarterly &#8220;reminder memo,&#8221; it&#8217;s a quick way to spread need-to-know info that makes <em>everyone</em>&#8216;s life easier.</li>
<li><strong>Maximize your e-payments software</strong>. No matter what software you use to process direct deposits, reimbursements and other payments, make sure you&#8217;re taking full advantage of its notification tools. Something as small as being able to e-mail folks that their anticipated payment just got processed can reassure them &#8212; and save you from having to handle one more phone call later on.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/more-worried-people-more-interruptions-for-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why you&#8217;ll soon be paying a little less</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/why-youll-soon-be-paying-a-little-less/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/why-youll-soon-be-paying-a-little-less/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS regs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IRS is dropping its interest rates for under- and overpayments, starting April 1. The new rates are: 6% for large corporate underpayments 4% for underpayments 3% for corporate overpayments, and 1.5% for the portion of a corporate overpayment that is more than $10,000.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IRS is dropping its interest rates for under- and overpayments, starting April 1. <span id="more-930"></span>The new rates are:</p>
<ul>
<li>6% for large corporate underpayments</li>
<li>4% for underpayments</li>
<li>3% for corporate overpayments, and</li>
<li>1.5% for the portion of a corporate overpayment that is more than $10,000.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/why-youll-soon-be-paying-a-little-less/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FLSA violation costs $35M in back OT and damages</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/flsa-violation-costs-35m/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/flsa-violation-costs-35m/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring & training staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OT regs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penalties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where to draw the line on who is or isn&#8217;t an exempt employee isn&#8217;t always clear. One company just got hit hard for making the wrong call. In a recent ruling, Family Dollar Stores was ordered to pay more than $35 million in back overtime pay and damages to more than 1400 current and former [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where to draw the line on who is or isn&#8217;t an exempt employee isn&#8217;t always clear. One company just got hit hard for making the wrong call. <span id="more-924"></span>In a recent ruling, Family Dollar Stores was ordered to pay more than $35 million in back overtime pay and damages to more than 1400 current and former store managers.</p>
<p>The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals said that the managers, who were routinely expected to put in shifts totally 60-70 hour per week, were wrongly treated as executive employees exempt from OT.</p>
<p>According to the appeals court, the managers were non-exempt for three main reasons:</p>
<ol>
<li>They spent 80-90% of their time performing non-exempt labor (running cash registers, stocking shelves, etc.)</li>
<li>Non-exempt tasks were considered an &#8220;essential&#8221; part of the managers&#8217; jobs, as opposed to &#8220;incidental.&#8221;</li>
<li>Managers had relatively little freedom. Instead, district managers handled most managerial decisions, such as pricing, choosing inventory, etc.</li>
<li>The average manager&#8217;s &#8220;exempt&#8221; salary was barely more than the average assistant manager&#8217;s salary.</li>
</ol>
<p>Cite<em>: Morgan v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.; 11th Circuit Ct. of Appeals, 12/18/08</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/flsa-violation-costs-35m/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2 ways to quench job burnout</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/xx-steps-to-quench-job-burnout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/xx-steps-to-quench-job-burnout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring & training staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Career outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee morale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When people are stressed, job burnout becomes a bigger risk &#8212; for your staffers and maybe even for you personally. Fortunately, no matter what&#8217;s going on in your company or the larger economy, there are steps you can take today to ease the risk of burnout: Create mini-goals that are very specific. Job stress and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When people are stressed, job burnout becomes a bigger risk &#8212; for your staffers and maybe even for you personally. <span id="more-835"></span>Fortunately, no matter what&#8217;s going on in your company or the larger economy, there are steps you can take today to ease the risk of burnout:</p>
<p><strong>Create mini-goals that are very specific. </strong><br />
Job stress and burnout arise when people feel they have little control over their work and/or few options.</p>
<p>But goals like &#8220;be more visible&#8221; or &#8220;work more efficiently&#8221; are hard to measure &#8212; and impossible to meet. (No matter how much you improve, theoretically there will be more you can do.)</p>
<p>Instead, try a very specific micro-goal. Instead of the examples above, you might try, &#8220;Offer at least one suggestion per meeting&#8221; or &#8220;Finish my check run before 2 p.m. each week.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll see tangible results right away, which boosts morale &#8212; not to mention that as you meet your goals and swap in new ones, you&#8217;re bound to be constantly improving.</p>
<p><strong>Refocus your time</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s all too easy to get caught up in putting out the most recent fire: There are missing invoices to track down, angry vendors on the phone and employees with questions about their paychecks constantly angling for your attention.</p>
<p>But spending all your time on those tasks leaves precious little time for other activities that can help you work better, save money, etc.</p>
<p>Take a few minutes to jot down your top goals (no more than three) for you and/or your department. Next, think about ways you could be working toward those goals but aren&#8217;t &#8212; these are the tasks most of us say we&#8217;ll get around to &#8220;once I have the time.&#8221;</p>
<p>Once you&#8217;ve established a few concrete steps, make it a goal to work on them at regular intervals. Key step: This should be time you have blocked out on your calendar &#8212; and stick to it. For example: Maybe you&#8217;ll need to spend 15 minutes a day to attack the pent-up filing pile. Or set aside one afternoon a month to analyze monthly spending in more detail than you can afford to now.</p>
<p>The simple act of putting it on your to-do list, can turn those &#8220;someday&#8221; tasks into finished projects.</p>
<p>What are some of your tricks for fighting burnout? Let us hear your ideas in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/xx-steps-to-quench-job-burnout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Automatic 401(k) enrollment: Final regs issued</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/automatic-401k-enrollment-final-regs-issued/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/automatic-401k-enrollment-final-regs-issued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fringe benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring & training staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS regs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New regs have been released for companies implementing automatic enrollment and contribution programs for their employees. The new regs cover several key issues for both Qualified Automatic Contribution Arrangements (QACA) and Eligible Automatic Contribution Arrangements (EACA). The final regs for QACAs are in effect for plan years begining on or after Jan. 1, 2008. For [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New regs have been released for companies implementing automatic enrollment and contribution programs for their employees. <span id="more-908"></span>The new regs cover several key issues for both Qualified Automatic Contribution Arrangements (QACA) and Eligible Automatic Contribution Arrangements (EACA). The final regs for QACAs are in effect for plan years begining on or after Jan. 1, 2008. For EACAs, the rules are effective for plan years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2010.</p>
<p>Here are the key points:</p>
<p><strong>QACAs</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Minimum percentage requirements</strong> &#8212; Plans must have a schedule of automatic contributions pr &#8220;qualified percentages&#8221; for eligible employees. They start at 3% for the intial period an employee is in the plan (up to two years). Following the intial period, the minimum qualified percentage increases by 1% point each year, for three years. The qualified percentage can never exceed 10% of an employee&#8217;s compensation.</li>
<li><strong>Uniformity requirement</strong> &#8212; The qualified percentage has to be applied to all eligible employees.</li>
<li><strong>Default and/or Affirmative elections</strong> &#8212; Default elections no longer apply to employees if they make an affirmative election to either not have contributions made or to make contributions at another percentage.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>EACAs</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Withdrawal elections &#8212; Elections to withdraw contributions made under an EACA must be made within 90 days of the first elective contribution an employee makes.</li>
<li>Non-universal eligible automatic contribution arrangements &#8212; Under an EACA, automatic enrollment doesn&#8217;t have to apply to all employees. It can apply only to those employees designated as covered by the company&#8217;s specific EACA.</li>
</ul>
<p>You can download the regulations in their entirety and get all the nitty-gritty details <a href="http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-3716.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/automatic-401k-enrollment-final-regs-issued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One &#8216;vendor&#8217; that&#8217;s giving up on collection calls</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/one-vendor-thats-giving-up-on-collection-calls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/one-vendor-thats-giving-up-on-collection-calls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS regs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penalties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IRS is eliminating its private debt collection program after three years. But that doesn&#8217;t mean those back taxes will go uncollected. The much-criticized program was likely to get axed by Congress anyway &#8212; many felt the program cost more to implement than it actually collected. Now, IRS will continue to go after unpaid taxes using [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IRS is eliminating its private debt collection program after three years. But that doesn&#8217;t mean those back taxes will go uncollected. <span id="more-910"></span>The much-criticized program was likely to get axed by Congress anyway &#8212; many felt the program cost more to implement than it actually collected.</p>
<p>Now, IRS will continue to go after unpaid taxes using internal resources: It plans to hire approximately 1,000 new collection agents this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/one-vendor-thats-giving-up-on-collection-calls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One payment that&#8217;s never reportable</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/one-payment-thats-never-reportable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/one-payment-thats-never-reportable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1099s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring & training staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A/P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax filing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[W-2s]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent private letter ruling clarifies one time when checks to workers aren&#8217;t reportable on W-2s or 1099s. If you pay attorney&#8217;s fees to employees as part of a class action settlement, those payments are not subject to information reporting or federal employment taxes. Bear in mind: Private letter rulings (PLRs) only apply to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent private letter ruling clarifies one time when checks to workers aren&#8217;t reportable on W-2s or 1099s. <span id="more-890"></span>If you pay attorney&#8217;s fees to employees as part of a class action settlement, those payments are not subject to information reporting or federal employment taxes.</p>
<p>Bear in mind: Private letter rulings (PLRs) only apply to the companies seeking them. But they do give you an idea of how IRS looks at certain issues.</p>
<p>In this case, employees sued the company for unpaid leave and vacation time. As part of the settlement, the court ordered the company to pay attorney&#8217;s fees for the employees in the suit. According to the PLR, the awarding of attorney&#8217;s fees is essentially a reimbursement of an expense. Therefore, it&#8217;s not subject to taxes or reporting.</p>
<p>You can the download the PLR <a href="http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-wd/0906010.pdf" target="_blank">here </a>to see all the details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/one-payment-thats-never-reportable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IRS looking for problems with 401(k) plan compliance</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/irs-looking-for-problems-with-401k-plan-compliance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/irs-looking-for-problems-with-401k-plan-compliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fringe benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t say we didn&#8217;t warn you: IRS has a new compliance issue it&#8217;s investigating, and it may have questions for you. The Service is about to start surveying companies, to find out how widespread compliance issues are within 401(k) plans. The areas it has its eyes on are: non discrimination rules, late deposits of employee [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t say we didn&#8217;t warn you: IRS has a new compliance issue it&#8217;s investigating, and it may have questions for you. <span id="more-882"></span>The Service is about to start surveying companies, to find out how widespread compliance issues are within 401(k) plans. The areas it has its eyes on are: non discrimination rules, late deposits of employee contributions, allowing hardship withdrawals to ineligible employees, etc.</p>
<p>If IRS finds problems/misinformation is common enough, you can expect increased audits and enforcement in this area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/irs-looking-for-problems-with-401k-plan-compliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4 small morale boosters with a big impact</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/4-small-morale-boosters-with-a-big-impact/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/4-small-morale-boosters-with-a-big-impact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A/P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee morale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring & training staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone is feeling the pressure these days, and Accounting staffers aren&#8217;t immune. It&#8217;s vital to find affordable ways to keep the troops motivated. Here are four ideas for low- or no-cost ways you can lift staffers&#8217; spirits &#8212; and hopefully gain some more tangible benefits too: Flex time and work-from-home options. These cost the company [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone is feeling the pressure these days, and Accounting staffers aren&#8217;t immune. It&#8217;s vital to find affordable ways to keep the troops motivated. <span id="more-871"></span>Here are four ideas for low- or no-cost ways you can lift staffers&#8217; spirits &#8212; and hopefully gain some more tangible benefits too:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Flex time and work-from-home options.</strong> These cost the company nothing, but can mean a lot to employees. Even if your company won&#8217;t allow it as a standard work arrangement, try to keep some flexibility in the schedule so that when workers have situations come up (car trouble, ill family member, etc.) they know they can tend to their jobs <em>and </em>their lives.</li>
<li><strong>Training opportunities. </strong>You don&#8217;t have to send staffers to a week-long conference across the country to show that you value them and want to develop their skills. Free or low-cost training close to home is often available via webinars, online classes and the like.</li>
<li><strong>Creative perks.</strong> Even if employees understand why raises are small or non-existent, it doesn&#8217;t mean they&#8217;ll like it. Finding other ways to show you appreciate them can help. Look for opportunities to partner with local businesses to find perks that won&#8217;t cost you an arm and a leg. For example, a local bakery may be willing to offer a special discount to employees if you provide a discounted service. Or if you can get a group of employees to sign up for a service (like a gym membership), you may be able to negotiate a better deal. If the company picks up part of the remaining cost, it&#8217;s that much more valuable to staffers.</li>
<li><strong>Pay for what matters.</strong> Let employees know that if you get a solid new hire through a staffer&#8217;s referral, they&#8217;ll be rewarded. It gives them reason to talk up the company to others &#8212; which gets them thinking about all the things they <em>do </em>like about the job.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/4-small-morale-boosters-with-a-big-impact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your opinion about office equipment?</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/your-opinion-about-office-equipment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/your-opinion-about-office-equipment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take our office equipment survey and be entered in a drawing for 1 of 10 guides from Better Buys for Business. We&#8217;ll share results in coming weeks. Link to the survey.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take our <a href="http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=zhOii8g91YzGEd8DrUky8w_3d_3d">office equipment survey</a> and be entered in a drawing for 1 of 10 guides from Better Buys for Business. <span id="more-864"></span></p>
<p>We&#8217;ll share results in coming weeks.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=zhOii8g91YzGEd8DrUky8w_3d_3d">Link to the survey</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/your-opinion-about-office-equipment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

