<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Changes ahead: Who gets a W-2, 1099</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.financeregs.com/changes-ahead-who-gets-a-w2-a-1099/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.financeregs.com/changes-ahead-who-gets-a-w2-a-1099/</link>
	<description>Breaking news &#38; updates for Finance and Accounting pros</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 10:45:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: D Powers</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/changes-ahead-who-gets-a-w2-a-1099/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>D Powers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=70#comment-103</guid>
		<description>We just completed an IRS audit and were faced with several misclassified IC&#039;s. If you need to classify an IC or employee, IRS Form SS-8 is the safest way to make the determination, let IRS do the work for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We just completed an IRS audit and were faced with several misclassified IC&#8217;s. If you need to classify an IC or employee, IRS Form SS-8 is the safest way to make the determination, let IRS do the work for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Zuanich</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/changes-ahead-who-gets-a-w2-a-1099/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>John Zuanich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 17:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=70#comment-99</guid>
		<description>There used to be the &quot;20-Factor Questionnaire&quot; the Service used for classification testing, but I believe it was simplified several years ago.  Will or has the Service published new criterion in support of H.R. 5804?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There used to be the &#8220;20-Factor Questionnaire&#8221; the Service used for classification testing, but I believe it was simplified several years ago.  Will or has the Service published new criterion in support of H.R. 5804?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margery Schaffer</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/changes-ahead-who-gets-a-w2-a-1099/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Margery Schaffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=70#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Is there a list of requirements that the IRS says proves a Vendor is an independent Sub-Contractor ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a list of requirements that the IRS says proves a Vendor is an independent Sub-Contractor ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

