<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FinanceRegs.com &#187; economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.financeregs.com/tag/economy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.financeregs.com</link>
	<description>Breaking news &#38; updates for Finance and Accounting pros</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:11:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Another sneaky fee worms its way into your T&amp;E</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/another-sneaky-fee-worms-its-way-into-your-te/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/another-sneaky-fee-worms-its-way-into-your-te/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 10:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring & training staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost cutting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reimbursements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An old policy is making a comeback &#8212; and it&#8217;ll rack up extra expenses for your company. To hook business travelers for more expensive tickets, airlines are bringing back minimum stay requirements. It works like this: The cheapest seats on flights to certain cities will require a one- to three-night stay, which means travelers will have to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An old policy is making a comeback &#8212; and it&#8217;ll rack up extra expenses for your company. <span id="more-106"></span>To hook business travelers for more expensive tickets, airlines are bringing back minimum stay requirements. It works like this: The cheapest seats on flights to certain cities will require a one- to three-night stay, which means travelers will have to choose between an expensive trip or a few nights away from home.</p>
<p>And that creates a dilemma for your company: The cheaper flight will also mean more nights at a hotel, additional meals and maybe extra days&#8217; rental car expenses. So a super cheap-o flight could easily cost you more when you factor in the additional travel expenses.</p>
<p>Not to mention that some employees will automatically book a more expensive flight without thinking about the cost simply because they&#8217;re eager to get home and sleep in their own beds.</p>
<p>To prevent problems, alert upper management now so they can settle on a definitive policy for how to handle the situation. Because it&#8217;s only going to become more common.</p>
<p>Right now, United&#8217;s the only airline using this new rule, but others are expected to follow suit &#8212; soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/another-sneaky-fee-worms-its-way-into-your-te/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Accounting field outlook is strong despite economy</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/accounting-field-outlook-is-strong-despite-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/accounting-field-outlook-is-strong-despite-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 10:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane Borer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hiring & training staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personnel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the economy faltering, times &#8212; and budgets &#8212; are tighter than ever. But what can already-maxed out Finance departments expect in terms of new hires or cutbacks? It&#8217;s mostly good news: 9% of companies expect to add full-time professionals, 5% plan staff reductions and the remaining 85% don&#8217;t anticipate any changes in Finance personnel. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the economy faltering, times &#8212; and budgets &#8212; are tighter than ever. But what can already-maxed out Finance departments expect in terms of new hires or cutbacks?<span id="more-26"></span></p>
<p>It&#8217;s mostly good news: 9% of companies expect to add full-time professionals, 5% plan staff reductions and the remaining 85% don&#8217;t anticipate any changes in Finance personnel. That&#8217;s according to the latest research from Robert Half International.</p>
<p>Those might not seem like a great numbers, but the 85% is really a blessing in disguise. It means the majority of departments will be able to handle current processes without fear of losing help and being stretched even further.</p>
<p>And those are just the national numbers. Depending on were your company&#8217;s located, there may be even greater reasons for optimism. In the South Atlantic region, for example, 13% of companies expect to add accounting and finance employees.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s partly because of the highly-competitive market, but it&#8217;s certainly relief for those who are either currently employed or are looking for a new job.</p>
<p>Industry factors in, too. Companies in the business services sector expect to see a 10% increase in hiring activity, while those in the construction industry anticipate a 7% spike in finance personnel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/accounting-field-outlook-is-strong-despite-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recession worries: What do they mean for Accounting?</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/recession-worries-what-do-they-mean-for-accounting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/recession-worries-what-do-they-mean-for-accounting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 18:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hiring & training staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/recession-worries-what-do-they-mean-for-accounting/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s not exactly news that the economy is, uh, in a &#8220;rough patch&#8221; at the moment. But some sectors of the economy are getting hit harder than others. Which leaves us wondering: What&#8217;s the outlook for Accounting pros? Turns out, not so bad. The latest Manpower Employment Outlook Survey shows just a small downward tick [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not exactly news that the economy is, uh, in a &#8220;rough patch&#8221; at the moment. But some sectors of the economy are getting hit harder than others. Which leaves us wondering: What&#8217;s the outlook for Accounting pros?<span id="more-18"></span> Turns out, not so bad.</p>
<p>The latest Manpower Employment Outlook Survey shows just a small downward tick for employment in the finance sector &#8212; 12% of firms say they&#8217;re expecting to increase headcount in the upcoming quarter. That&#8217;s down just one point from last quarter. (OK, 12% may not seem <em>great</em>, but compare that to industries like construction where only 3% are expecting to grow payrolls.)</p>
<p>Where you&#8217;re located makes a big difference too. The Northeast leads the way with slight growth &#8212; 16% of companies are planning to hire, up from 14%. In the South, hiring looks to remain basically flat at 17% (down from 18%).</p>
<p>Manpower predicts the Midwest and West will get hit the hardest. Only 10% of companies in the Midwest are planning to hire (down from 15%) and in the West that number is 14% (down from 24%).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/recession-worries-what-do-they-mean-for-accounting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

