<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FinanceRegs.com &#187; IRS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.financeregs.com/tag/irs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.financeregs.com</link>
	<description>Breaking news &#38; updates for Finance and Accounting pros</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:11:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why you&#8217;ll soon be paying a little less</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/why-youll-soon-be-paying-a-little-less/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/why-youll-soon-be-paying-a-little-less/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS regs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IRS is dropping its interest rates for under- and overpayments, starting April 1. The new rates are: 6% for large corporate underpayments 4% for underpayments 3% for corporate overpayments, and 1.5% for the portion of a corporate overpayment that is more than $10,000.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IRS is dropping its interest rates for under- and overpayments, starting April 1. <span id="more-930"></span>The new rates are:</p>
<ul>
<li>6% for large corporate underpayments</li>
<li>4% for underpayments</li>
<li>3% for corporate overpayments, and</li>
<li>1.5% for the portion of a corporate overpayment that is more than $10,000.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/why-youll-soon-be-paying-a-little-less/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Automatic 401(k) enrollment: Final regs issued</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/automatic-401k-enrollment-final-regs-issued/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/automatic-401k-enrollment-final-regs-issued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fringe benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring & training staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS regs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New regs have been released for companies implementing automatic enrollment and contribution programs for their employees. The new regs cover several key issues for both Qualified Automatic Contribution Arrangements (QACA) and Eligible Automatic Contribution Arrangements (EACA). The final regs for QACAs are in effect for plan years begining on or after Jan. 1, 2008. For [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New regs have been released for companies implementing automatic enrollment and contribution programs for their employees. <span id="more-908"></span>The new regs cover several key issues for both Qualified Automatic Contribution Arrangements (QACA) and Eligible Automatic Contribution Arrangements (EACA). The final regs for QACAs are in effect for plan years begining on or after Jan. 1, 2008. For EACAs, the rules are effective for plan years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2010.</p>
<p>Here are the key points:</p>
<p><strong>QACAs</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Minimum percentage requirements</strong> &#8212; Plans must have a schedule of automatic contributions pr &#8220;qualified percentages&#8221; for eligible employees. They start at 3% for the intial period an employee is in the plan (up to two years). Following the intial period, the minimum qualified percentage increases by 1% point each year, for three years. The qualified percentage can never exceed 10% of an employee&#8217;s compensation.</li>
<li><strong>Uniformity requirement</strong> &#8212; The qualified percentage has to be applied to all eligible employees.</li>
<li><strong>Default and/or Affirmative elections</strong> &#8212; Default elections no longer apply to employees if they make an affirmative election to either not have contributions made or to make contributions at another percentage.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>EACAs</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Withdrawal elections &#8212; Elections to withdraw contributions made under an EACA must be made within 90 days of the first elective contribution an employee makes.</li>
<li>Non-universal eligible automatic contribution arrangements &#8212; Under an EACA, automatic enrollment doesn&#8217;t have to apply to all employees. It can apply only to those employees designated as covered by the company&#8217;s specific EACA.</li>
</ul>
<p>You can download the regulations in their entirety and get all the nitty-gritty details <a href="http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-3716.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/automatic-401k-enrollment-final-regs-issued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One &#8216;vendor&#8217; that&#8217;s giving up on collection calls</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/one-vendor-thats-giving-up-on-collection-calls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/one-vendor-thats-giving-up-on-collection-calls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS regs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penalties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IRS is eliminating its private debt collection program after three years. But that doesn&#8217;t mean those back taxes will go uncollected. The much-criticized program was likely to get axed by Congress anyway &#8212; many felt the program cost more to implement than it actually collected. Now, IRS will continue to go after unpaid taxes using [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IRS is eliminating its private debt collection program after three years. But that doesn&#8217;t mean those back taxes will go uncollected. <span id="more-910"></span>The much-criticized program was likely to get axed by Congress anyway &#8212; many felt the program cost more to implement than it actually collected.</p>
<p>Now, IRS will continue to go after unpaid taxes using internal resources: It plans to hire approximately 1,000 new collection agents this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/one-vendor-thats-giving-up-on-collection-calls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One payment that&#8217;s never reportable</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/one-payment-thats-never-reportable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/one-payment-thats-never-reportable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1099s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring & training staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A/P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax filing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[W-2s]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent private letter ruling clarifies one time when checks to workers aren&#8217;t reportable on W-2s or 1099s. If you pay attorney&#8217;s fees to employees as part of a class action settlement, those payments are not subject to information reporting or federal employment taxes. Bear in mind: Private letter rulings (PLRs) only apply to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent private letter ruling clarifies one time when checks to workers aren&#8217;t reportable on W-2s or 1099s. <span id="more-890"></span>If you pay attorney&#8217;s fees to employees as part of a class action settlement, those payments are not subject to information reporting or federal employment taxes.</p>
<p>Bear in mind: Private letter rulings (PLRs) only apply to the companies seeking them. But they do give you an idea of how IRS looks at certain issues.</p>
<p>In this case, employees sued the company for unpaid leave and vacation time. As part of the settlement, the court ordered the company to pay attorney&#8217;s fees for the employees in the suit. According to the PLR, the awarding of attorney&#8217;s fees is essentially a reimbursement of an expense. Therefore, it&#8217;s not subject to taxes or reporting.</p>
<p>You can the download the PLR <a href="http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-wd/0906010.pdf" target="_blank">here </a>to see all the details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/one-payment-thats-never-reportable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IRS looking for problems with 401(k) plan compliance</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/irs-looking-for-problems-with-401k-plan-compliance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/irs-looking-for-problems-with-401k-plan-compliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fringe benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t say we didn&#8217;t warn you: IRS has a new compliance issue it&#8217;s investigating, and it may have questions for you. The Service is about to start surveying companies, to find out how widespread compliance issues are within 401(k) plans. The areas it has its eyes on are: non discrimination rules, late deposits of employee [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t say we didn&#8217;t warn you: IRS has a new compliance issue it&#8217;s investigating, and it may have questions for you. <span id="more-882"></span>The Service is about to start surveying companies, to find out how widespread compliance issues are within 401(k) plans. The areas it has its eyes on are: non discrimination rules, late deposits of employee contributions, allowing hardship withdrawals to ineligible employees, etc.</p>
<p>If IRS finds problems/misinformation is common enough, you can expect increased audits and enforcement in this area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/irs-looking-for-problems-with-401k-plan-compliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IRS gets a friendlier face</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/irs-gets-a-friendlier-face/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/irs-gets-a-friendlier-face/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax filing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thinking about the tax man may not give you the warm-and-fuzzies, but IRS is making headway in creating a more helpful Web site. In a recent study of 95 federal govenment Web sites, IRS was rated the most improved. The site, which has made improvements to search functions, ease of navigation and other areas where [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thinking about the tax man may not give you the warm-and-fuzzies, but IRS is making headway in creating a more helpful Web site. <span id="more-848"></span>In a recent study of 95 federal govenment Web sites, IRS was rated the most improved.</p>
<p>The site, which has made improvements to search functions, ease of navigation and other areas where users complained it was lacking, gained eight points on a scale of 1 to 100, giving it a solid &#8220;C.&#8221;</p>
<p>No doubt there&#8217;s still room for improvement &#8212; but at least it&#8217;s headed in the right direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/irs-gets-a-friendlier-face/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are you on the list for an employment tax audit?</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/are-you-on-the-list-for-an-employment-tax-audit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/are-you-on-the-list-for-an-employment-tax-audit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1099s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring & training staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS regs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A/P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Want a sneak peek at whom IRS is auditing this year? Be careful: It could be anyone. IRS has warned its going to start doing random employment tax audits in 2010. It&#8217;s aim: To find out exactly how much tax revenue the feds are losing due to employees being misclassified as independent contractors (ICs). IC [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want a sneak peek at whom IRS is auditing this year? <span id="more-845"></span>Be careful: It could be anyone.</p>
<p>IRS has warned its going to start doing random employment tax audits in 2010. It&#8217;s aim: To find out exactly how much tax revenue the feds are losing due to employees being misclassified as independent contractors (ICs).</p>
<p>IC classification has always been a gray area &#8212; which is why many companies have relied on making an educated guess and then knocking on wood. Without any other red flags, many potentially misclassified employees (and their employers) have flown under the radar.</p>
<p>Random audits could be done at any company &#8212; there&#8217;s no way to minimize your risk of getting flagged.</p>
<p>What you can do: Go through your hiring procedures now and review the work done by ICs. The first random audits won&#8217;t be done until around April 2010, so there&#8217;s still time to address any questionable classifications you have on your books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/are-you-on-the-list-for-an-employment-tax-audit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>COBRA credit: How to claim what you&#8217;re due</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/cobra-credit-how-to-claim-what-youre-due/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/cobra-credit-how-to-claim-what-youre-due/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[April 15 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fringe benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring & training staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS regs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax filing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IRS is moving quickly: Here are the details on how to claim the credit for COBRA premiums you&#8217;ll have to pay for recently laid-off workers. The COBRA credit was part of the recent stimulus package, but until now, we had no specifics on how employers could actually claim the credit. Here&#8217;s what you need to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IRS is moving quickly: Here are the details on how to claim the credit for COBRA premiums you&#8217;ll have to pay for recently laid-off workers. <span id="more-825"></span>The COBRA credit was part of the <a href="http://www.financeregs.com/stimulus-package-4-steps-you-need-to-take-now/" target="_blank">recent stimulus package</a>, but until now, we had no specifics on how employers could actually claim the credit. Here&#8217;s what you need to know now.</p>
<p>To claim the credit, you&#8217;ll need the proper documentation:</p>
<ul>
<li>Proof you received the employee&#8217;s share of the premium (35%)</li>
<li>A declaration that the former employee was &#8220;involuntarily terminated,&#8221; and</li>
<li>For insured plans, a copy of the invoice or similar statement  from the insurance carrier, as well as proof the premium was paid on time.</li>
</ul>
<p>You can claim your credit on Form 941, starting with the first quarter of &#8217;09.</p>
<p>IRS has also released a new <a href="http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=204708,00.html" target="_blank">FAQ page for employers</a> who need more details on the new procedure. If employees (or former employees) have questions about their rights and responsibilities, you can refer them to <a href="http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=204505,00.html" target="_blank">this page</a>, which has several links to even more info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/cobra-credit-how-to-claim-what-youre-due/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New withholding tables are here!</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/irs-releases-new-withholding-rates-in-response-to-stimulus-package/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/irs-releases-new-withholding-rates-in-response-to-stimulus-package/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring & training staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS regs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Withholding rates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#8217;ll need to act fast. Your company must be using the new rates no later than April 1. The new rates are the feds&#8217; method of implementing the &#8220;Making Work Pay&#8221; credit in the recently passed stimulus package. The new withholding tables are in effect for wages paid through Dec. 2009. The tables, as well [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ll need to act fast. Your company must be using the new rates no later than <span id="more-803"></span>April 1.</p>
<p>The new rates are the feds&#8217; method of implementing the &#8220;Making Work Pay&#8221; credit in the recently passed stimulus package.</p>
<p>The new withholding tables are in effect for wages paid through Dec. 2009. The tables, as well as instructions on how to comply with the new law, will be incorporated into a new IRS Publication 15-T. Pub. 15-T will be posted on IRS&#8217; site next week, and mailed to employers in mid-March. But you can already get a sneak peek <a href="http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/n1036.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>Until you get the final, official publication, here are the key points you need to know:</p>
<ul>
<li>IRS requests employers start using the new withholding tables as soon as possible, but no later than April 1.</li>
<li>Workers don&#8217;t need to submit a new W-4 to get the credit, but they will have to claim it when they do their &#8217;09 taxes. (Note: Workers who have multiple jobs may want to review their W-4s to ensure they have enough withholding being done.)</li>
</ul>
<p>Note: The credit phases out for higher-income employees. Be prepared for questions from them, and other employees who may not understand how the tax credit works or how they can get the benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/irs-releases-new-withholding-rates-in-response-to-stimulus-package/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On-call time: When is it compensable?</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/on-call-time-when-is-it-compensable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/on-call-time-when-is-it-compensable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring & training staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It isn&#8217;t always easy to figure out when you have to pay employees for time that they&#8217;re on call. But this latest opinion letter sheds some light. In the case, a nonprofit ambulance service paid drivers hourly from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m In addition, the drivers were also on call in the early morning [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It isn&#8217;t always easy to figure out when you have to pay employees for time that they&#8217;re on call. But this latest opinion letter sheds some light. <span id="more-791"></span>In the <a href="http://www.dol.gov/esa/whd/opinion/FLSANA/2008/2008_05_23_08NA_FLSA.pdf" target="_blank">case</a>, a nonprofit ambulance service paid drivers hourly from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m In addition, the drivers were also on call in the early morning or late evening five days a week.</p>
<p><strong>The facts</strong></p>
<p>When they were on call, drivers had to:</p>
<ul>
<li>respond to calls within 8 minutes, including driving to the squad house and picking up an ambulance</li>
<li>be reachable at all times, and</li>
<li>refrain from using alcohol and other substances that might impair their judgment.</li>
</ul>
<p>The number of calls the drivers had to respond to varied greatly. In the winter, it was common to respond every day; other times of the year, a week could pass without being called. Drivers couldn&#8217;t trade on-call shifts (there weren&#8217;t enough drivers to cover them all) and they couldn&#8217;t refuse to respond to a call.</p>
<p><strong>Ruling</strong></p>
<p>DOL ruled that on call time was compensable during the <strong>winter</strong> because drivers couldn&#8217;t freely engage in most personal activities. Due to the frequency of the calls and the speedy response required, any personal activities were severely restricted.</p>
<p>However, on-call periods at other times of the year were not deemed compensable. Because the calls were so infrequent, the drivers&#8217; personal activities weren&#8217;t as restricted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/on-call-time-when-is-it-compensable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

