<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FinanceRegs.com &#187; Payroll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.financeregs.com/tag/payroll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.financeregs.com</link>
	<description>Breaking news &#38; updates for Finance and Accounting pros</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:11:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>More worried people = more interruptions for you</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/more-worried-people-more-interruptions-for-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/more-worried-people-more-interruptions-for-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fringe benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring & training staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A/P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reimbursements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nervous vendors eager for payment. Cash-strapped employees who need their checks yesterday in order to pay their bills. When people have shaky finances, it means more phone calls and questions for Accounting pros. As tempting as it can be some days, turning off the phone and hiding under your desk isn&#8217;t an option. But there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nervous vendors eager for payment. Cash-strapped employees who need their checks yesterday in order to pay their bills. When people have shaky finances, it means more phone calls and questions for Accounting pros. <span id="more-801"></span>As tempting as it can be some days, turning off the phone and hiding under your desk isn&#8217;t an option. But there are some steps you can take to minimize the interruptions so you can get your work done &#8212; and still offer the assistance that everyone else is looking for. Here are some ideas:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Use voicemail creatively.</strong> Voicemail isn&#8217;t just for taking messages, it can send them too. Changing your outgoing message to include the most frequently asked-for info (what days checks are mailed, deadlines for common forms, etc.) can head off an amazing amount of questions.</li>
<li><strong>Dedicate different lines for different tasks.</strong> If your phone system allows it, set up separate phone lines/voicemail boxes for your different internal and external &#8220;customers.&#8221; For example, you could direct callers with questions about vendor payments to one line, those looking for T&amp;E reimbursements to another, and employees with questions about payroll or benefits to a third. That way, you can take care of related questions in one swoop, which should save time and mental energy.</li>
<li><strong>Create a FAQ page for Accounting</strong>. If, like most Accounting pros, you get the same few questions over and over, it&#8217;s time to create a set list of answers. Posted on the intranet, or even sent as a quarterly &#8220;reminder memo,&#8221; it&#8217;s a quick way to spread need-to-know info that makes <em>everyone</em>&#8216;s life easier.</li>
<li><strong>Maximize your e-payments software</strong>. No matter what software you use to process direct deposits, reimbursements and other payments, make sure you&#8217;re taking full advantage of its notification tools. Something as small as being able to e-mail folks that their anticipated payment just got processed can reassure them &#8212; and save you from having to handle one more phone call later on.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/more-worried-people-more-interruptions-for-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spreadsheet fixes to reduce errors, save time</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/spreadsheet-fixes-to-reduce-errors-save-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/spreadsheet-fixes-to-reduce-errors-save-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring & training staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A/P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the amount of financial info you have to track, a spreadsheet is one of your most potent tools. But the more important (and complicated) a spreadsheet is, the more likely it is to have one of these major flaws. The good news: They&#8217;re all fixable. And those fixes can help you work more efficiently [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-57" title="man-entering-maze" src="http://www.financeregs.com/wp-content/uploads/man-entering-maze.jpg" alt="man-entering-maze" width="360" height="270" /></p>
<p>With the amount of financial info you have to track, a spreadsheet is one of your most potent tools. But the more important (and complicated) a spreadsheet is, the more likely it is to have one of these major flaws. <span id="more-933"></span>The good news: They&#8217;re all fixable. And those fixes can help you work more efficiently in the long run. Here&#8217;s what to look out for:</p>
<ol>
<li>Hidden errors. No matter how well &#8212; or often &#8212; you check, a big complicated spreadsheet is bound to have some errors sneak in over time. And it&#8217;ll happen twice as fast if it&#8217;s a worksheet that multiple people have access to.  The fix: Periodically use one of the many programs that searches spreadsheets for cells that have missing formulas, broken links, references to empty cells, etc.</li>
<li>Too many chefs stirring the pot. There may be good reason for a dozen people to have access to see a spreadsheet &#8212; but chances are they don&#8217;t all need access to input data. Whenever possible, use Excel&#8217;s existing features (such as password-protection) to limit access to &#8220;read-only&#8221; for key files that need to be shared among many people.</li>
<li>Not knowing who did what. Even if access to input data into the worksheet is limited to only two trusted people, there may be times when it&#8217;s not clear which version of the spreadsheet is the last one. Make sure you have a system in place to track who made what changes and when. (For larger departments, software is available to handle this. For smaller companies, you may be able to get by with a solid naming/&#8221;save as&#8221; system.)</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/spreadsheet-fixes-to-reduce-errors-save-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FLSA violation costs $35M in back OT and damages</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/flsa-violation-costs-35m/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/flsa-violation-costs-35m/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring & training staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OT regs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penalties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where to draw the line on who is or isn&#8217;t an exempt employee isn&#8217;t always clear. One company just got hit hard for making the wrong call. In a recent ruling, Family Dollar Stores was ordered to pay more than $35 million in back overtime pay and damages to more than 1400 current and former [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where to draw the line on who is or isn&#8217;t an exempt employee isn&#8217;t always clear. One company just got hit hard for making the wrong call. <span id="more-924"></span>In a recent ruling, Family Dollar Stores was ordered to pay more than $35 million in back overtime pay and damages to more than 1400 current and former store managers.</p>
<p>The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals said that the managers, who were routinely expected to put in shifts totally 60-70 hour per week, were wrongly treated as executive employees exempt from OT.</p>
<p>According to the appeals court, the managers were non-exempt for three main reasons:</p>
<ol>
<li>They spent 80-90% of their time performing non-exempt labor (running cash registers, stocking shelves, etc.)</li>
<li>Non-exempt tasks were considered an &#8220;essential&#8221; part of the managers&#8217; jobs, as opposed to &#8220;incidental.&#8221;</li>
<li>Managers had relatively little freedom. Instead, district managers handled most managerial decisions, such as pricing, choosing inventory, etc.</li>
<li>The average manager&#8217;s &#8220;exempt&#8221; salary was barely more than the average assistant manager&#8217;s salary.</li>
</ol>
<p>Cite<em>: Morgan v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.; 11th Circuit Ct. of Appeals, 12/18/08</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/flsa-violation-costs-35m/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Automatic 401(k) enrollment: Final regs issued</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/automatic-401k-enrollment-final-regs-issued/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/automatic-401k-enrollment-final-regs-issued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fringe benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring & training staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS regs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New regs have been released for companies implementing automatic enrollment and contribution programs for their employees. The new regs cover several key issues for both Qualified Automatic Contribution Arrangements (QACA) and Eligible Automatic Contribution Arrangements (EACA). The final regs for QACAs are in effect for plan years begining on or after Jan. 1, 2008. For [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New regs have been released for companies implementing automatic enrollment and contribution programs for their employees. <span id="more-908"></span>The new regs cover several key issues for both Qualified Automatic Contribution Arrangements (QACA) and Eligible Automatic Contribution Arrangements (EACA). The final regs for QACAs are in effect for plan years begining on or after Jan. 1, 2008. For EACAs, the rules are effective for plan years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2010.</p>
<p>Here are the key points:</p>
<p><strong>QACAs</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Minimum percentage requirements</strong> &#8212; Plans must have a schedule of automatic contributions pr &#8220;qualified percentages&#8221; for eligible employees. They start at 3% for the intial period an employee is in the plan (up to two years). Following the intial period, the minimum qualified percentage increases by 1% point each year, for three years. The qualified percentage can never exceed 10% of an employee&#8217;s compensation.</li>
<li><strong>Uniformity requirement</strong> &#8212; The qualified percentage has to be applied to all eligible employees.</li>
<li><strong>Default and/or Affirmative elections</strong> &#8212; Default elections no longer apply to employees if they make an affirmative election to either not have contributions made or to make contributions at another percentage.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>EACAs</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Withdrawal elections &#8212; Elections to withdraw contributions made under an EACA must be made within 90 days of the first elective contribution an employee makes.</li>
<li>Non-universal eligible automatic contribution arrangements &#8212; Under an EACA, automatic enrollment doesn&#8217;t have to apply to all employees. It can apply only to those employees designated as covered by the company&#8217;s specific EACA.</li>
</ul>
<p>You can download the regulations in their entirety and get all the nitty-gritty details <a href="http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-3716.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/automatic-401k-enrollment-final-regs-issued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One payment that&#8217;s never reportable</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/one-payment-thats-never-reportable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/one-payment-thats-never-reportable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1099s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring & training staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A/P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax filing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[W-2s]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent private letter ruling clarifies one time when checks to workers aren&#8217;t reportable on W-2s or 1099s. If you pay attorney&#8217;s fees to employees as part of a class action settlement, those payments are not subject to information reporting or federal employment taxes. Bear in mind: Private letter rulings (PLRs) only apply to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent private letter ruling clarifies one time when checks to workers aren&#8217;t reportable on W-2s or 1099s. <span id="more-890"></span>If you pay attorney&#8217;s fees to employees as part of a class action settlement, those payments are not subject to information reporting or federal employment taxes.</p>
<p>Bear in mind: Private letter rulings (PLRs) only apply to the companies seeking them. But they do give you an idea of how IRS looks at certain issues.</p>
<p>In this case, employees sued the company for unpaid leave and vacation time. As part of the settlement, the court ordered the company to pay attorney&#8217;s fees for the employees in the suit. According to the PLR, the awarding of attorney&#8217;s fees is essentially a reimbursement of an expense. Therefore, it&#8217;s not subject to taxes or reporting.</p>
<p>You can the download the PLR <a href="http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-wd/0906010.pdf" target="_blank">here </a>to see all the details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/one-payment-thats-never-reportable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IRS looking for problems with 401(k) plan compliance</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/irs-looking-for-problems-with-401k-plan-compliance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/irs-looking-for-problems-with-401k-plan-compliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fringe benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t say we didn&#8217;t warn you: IRS has a new compliance issue it&#8217;s investigating, and it may have questions for you. The Service is about to start surveying companies, to find out how widespread compliance issues are within 401(k) plans. The areas it has its eyes on are: non discrimination rules, late deposits of employee [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t say we didn&#8217;t warn you: IRS has a new compliance issue it&#8217;s investigating, and it may have questions for you. <span id="more-882"></span>The Service is about to start surveying companies, to find out how widespread compliance issues are within 401(k) plans. The areas it has its eyes on are: non discrimination rules, late deposits of employee contributions, allowing hardship withdrawals to ineligible employees, etc.</p>
<p>If IRS finds problems/misinformation is common enough, you can expect increased audits and enforcement in this area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/irs-looking-for-problems-with-401k-plan-compliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4 small morale boosters with a big impact</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/4-small-morale-boosters-with-a-big-impact/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/4-small-morale-boosters-with-a-big-impact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A/P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee morale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring & training staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone is feeling the pressure these days, and Accounting staffers aren&#8217;t immune. It&#8217;s vital to find affordable ways to keep the troops motivated. Here are four ideas for low- or no-cost ways you can lift staffers&#8217; spirits &#8212; and hopefully gain some more tangible benefits too: Flex time and work-from-home options. These cost the company [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone is feeling the pressure these days, and Accounting staffers aren&#8217;t immune. It&#8217;s vital to find affordable ways to keep the troops motivated. <span id="more-871"></span>Here are four ideas for low- or no-cost ways you can lift staffers&#8217; spirits &#8212; and hopefully gain some more tangible benefits too:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Flex time and work-from-home options.</strong> These cost the company nothing, but can mean a lot to employees. Even if your company won&#8217;t allow it as a standard work arrangement, try to keep some flexibility in the schedule so that when workers have situations come up (car trouble, ill family member, etc.) they know they can tend to their jobs <em>and </em>their lives.</li>
<li><strong>Training opportunities. </strong>You don&#8217;t have to send staffers to a week-long conference across the country to show that you value them and want to develop their skills. Free or low-cost training close to home is often available via webinars, online classes and the like.</li>
<li><strong>Creative perks.</strong> Even if employees understand why raises are small or non-existent, it doesn&#8217;t mean they&#8217;ll like it. Finding other ways to show you appreciate them can help. Look for opportunities to partner with local businesses to find perks that won&#8217;t cost you an arm and a leg. For example, a local bakery may be willing to offer a special discount to employees if you provide a discounted service. Or if you can get a group of employees to sign up for a service (like a gym membership), you may be able to negotiate a better deal. If the company picks up part of the remaining cost, it&#8217;s that much more valuable to staffers.</li>
<li><strong>Pay for what matters.</strong> Let employees know that if you get a solid new hire through a staffer&#8217;s referral, they&#8217;ll be rewarded. It gives them reason to talk up the company to others &#8212; which gets them thinking about all the things they <em>do </em>like about the job.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/4-small-morale-boosters-with-a-big-impact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ready for the next audit? Think again</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/ready-for-the-next-audit-think-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/ready-for-the-next-audit-think-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A/P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cost cutting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Error prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You think you have your bases covered for the next audit. But chances are your boss doesn&#8217;t have the same faith in you. That&#8217;s the learning from a recent survey by Deloitte. The company asked executives to rate their organizations based on how ready they are for audits or other &#8220;regulatory investigations.&#8221; Only 20% said [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-4" title="Best Practices for Controls and Procedures" src="http://www.financeregs.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/best-practices.jpg" alt="Best Practices for Controls and Procedures" width="360" height="200" /></p>
<p>You think you have your bases covered for the next audit. But chances are your boss doesn&#8217;t have the same faith in you. <span id="more-850"></span>That&#8217;s the learning from a recent survey by Deloitte. The company asked executives to rate their organizations based on how ready they are for audits or other &#8220;regulatory investigations.&#8221; Only 20% said they thought their troops were &#8220;very ready.&#8221;</p>
<p>Worse news for Accounting pros: 24% of execs said their companies are at a much greater risk for such an investigation than they were just a year ago. Given the economic climate &#8212; and people&#8217;s feelings about it &#8212; it seems certain that <em>some </em>companies are bound to get more scrutiny in the near future. And coming up short of good answers could lead to not only financial or legal action &#8212; it could leave your company with the proverbial egg on its  face.</p>
<p><strong>How to get ready</strong></p>
<p>One bright spot from the survey: 60% of company execs agreed that self-reporting results of internal audits could help identify problems while they&#8217;re still fixable and/or mitigate the damage from other investigations.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t already have self-audits scheduled, now&#8217;s the time to get the ball rolling. Even if you&#8217;re already sure your procedures and books are as tight as a drum, a successful self-audit can give you two other important benefits:</p>
<ul>
<li>proving to upper management that you are ready for the &#8220;real&#8221; audit, and</li>
<li>finding errors, cash-drains and other ways to potentially save money down the road.</li>
</ul>
<p>Tell us: Do you think your company&#8217;s ready for an audit or investigation? Is upper management&#8217;s skepticism warranted? Sound off in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/ready-for-the-next-audit-think-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are you on the list for an employment tax audit?</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/are-you-on-the-list-for-an-employment-tax-audit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/are-you-on-the-list-for-an-employment-tax-audit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1099s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring & training staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS regs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A/P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Want a sneak peek at whom IRS is auditing this year? Be careful: It could be anyone. IRS has warned its going to start doing random employment tax audits in 2010. It&#8217;s aim: To find out exactly how much tax revenue the feds are losing due to employees being misclassified as independent contractors (ICs). IC [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want a sneak peek at whom IRS is auditing this year? <span id="more-845"></span>Be careful: It could be anyone.</p>
<p>IRS has warned its going to start doing random employment tax audits in 2010. It&#8217;s aim: To find out exactly how much tax revenue the feds are losing due to employees being misclassified as independent contractors (ICs).</p>
<p>IC classification has always been a gray area &#8212; which is why many companies have relied on making an educated guess and then knocking on wood. Without any other red flags, many potentially misclassified employees (and their employers) have flown under the radar.</p>
<p>Random audits could be done at any company &#8212; there&#8217;s no way to minimize your risk of getting flagged.</p>
<p>What you can do: Go through your hiring procedures now and review the work done by ICs. The first random audits won&#8217;t be done until around April 2010, so there&#8217;s still time to address any questionable classifications you have on your books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/are-you-on-the-list-for-an-employment-tax-audit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Manage the clock, don&#8217;t let it manage you</title>
		<link>http://www.financeregs.com/manage-the-clock-dont-let-it-manage-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.financeregs.com/manage-the-clock-dont-let-it-manage-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Katarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring & training staff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news & views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A/P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Efficiency booster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saving time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financeregs.com/?p=832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s inevitable: Interruptions from co-workers and outsiders with questions they need answered now. But spending too much time helping them can keep you from doing your real job. Here are four strategies you can use to minimize the time spent on interruptions while still providing everyone with the information they need: Let it ring. Contrary [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s inevitable: Interruptions from co-workers and outsiders with questions they need answered now. But spending too much time helping them can keep you from doing your real job. <span id="more-832"></span>Here are four strategies you can use to minimize the time spent on interruptions while still providing everyone with the information they need:</p>
<li><strong>Let it ring</strong><strong>.</strong> Contrary to popular belief, the world won&#8217;t end if you let the phone ring. And new e-mail messages will stay in your in-box until you&#8217;re ready to read them. You can double your efficiency by checking phone and e-mail messages at set times of the day. The benefit is two-fold: Returning messages in a &#8220;batch&#8221; makes the process more efficient. Plus, when you can focus on getting payroll or a check run out the door without being a slave to the phone, you&#8217;re more accurate and work more quickly.</li>
<li><strong>Pick and choose your multi-tasking times</strong><strong>.</strong> There&#8217;s a time and a place for multi-tasking. But studies have shown doing more than one task at a time leads to more errors and can slow you down in some cases. Best bet: Only multi-task on projects where the stakes are low. Checking e-mail while you&#8217;re on hold? Efficient. Mailing payments while you try to eat lunch and take in a webinar on garnishments? Asking for trouble.</li>
<li><strong>Just say no to chatting.</strong> When you&#8217;re busy, it&#8217;s fine to tell your cubicle-neighbor that now&#8217;s not the time to talk about who got voted off of Idol last night. If you feel like it&#8217;s rude not to take part, remember: Everyone enjoys a friendly break in the day &#8212; but everyone also understands you&#8217;re there to work, not to dissect pop culture.</li>
<li><strong>Set office hours</strong>. If you have a door, use it. There&#8217;s no better way to signal that you need some uninterrupted time to work. If you&#8217;re in a cubicle or other open office set-up, consider advertising &#8220;open office hours.&#8221; That&#8217;s time you set aside specifically to answer questions, show people which forms they need, etc.</li>
<p>What tactics have you used to take more control over your time? Share your ideas in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.financeregs.com/manage-the-clock-dont-let-it-manage-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

